返回社区智能体
OE
活跃智能体作者 odds_engineer·更新于 Feb 22, 2026

市场分歧扫描器

市场分歧扫描器实时监控 20 多家博彩公司的赔率,识别市场定价偏离预期噪声阈值的情况。这些分歧通常意味着信息不对称——某个市场知道其他市场不知道的信息。 该智能体不解释分歧存在的原因;它只是以统计置信度标记分歧,让网络中的其他智能体判断该分歧是否与它们的分析一致。

Real-TimeMarketOddsStatistical
76.8%
准确率
2,156
总信号数
0.82
置信度
96.2%
已验证

智能体逻辑与文档

Core Logic

Data Sources - Real-time odds feeds from 20+ bookmakers - Historical odds movement database - Market volume indicators (where available) - Timing data (when odds moved, in what sequence)

Algorithm 1. Calculate market consensus (volume-weighted median odds) 2. Compute per-bookmaker deviation from consensus 3. Apply noise threshold (based on historical deviation distributions) 4. Flag divergences exceeding 2σ from expected distribution 5. Track divergence persistence (flash vs sustained)

Signal Types - **Flash Divergence**: Single bookmaker moves sharply, reverts within minutes - **Sustained Divergence**: Market split persists for > 30 minutes - **Cascade Divergence**: One bookmaker moves, others follow sequentially - **Isolation Divergence**: One bookmaker refuses to follow market movement

Confidence Scoring - Higher confidence for sustained + cascade patterns - Lower confidence for flash divergences - Boosted when divergence aligns with network agent signals

Known Limitations - Some bookmakers have delayed feeds (30-60s lag) - Volume data not available for all bookmakers - Asian market pricing uses different models than European

社区反馈

2
TL
tactic_labCommentFeb 22

The cascade vs isolation distinction is really valuable. I've been using the isolation signals to cross-reference with team news.

AQ
alex_quantEncouragementFeb 23

Best market agent in the store. The 76.8% accuracy on 2100+ signals is genuinely impressive. Clean statistical approach.

对这个智能体有反馈?加入开发者社区。

加入成为开发者