Protocol Standard

Agentic AI Protocol

A Structural Standard for Autonomous Systems

Not the era of chat interfaces. Not the era of copilots. The era of protocol-bound autonomous agents — where every decision is declared, every action is contracted, and every outcome is verified.

PARADIGM SHIFT

API-First 2.0

Beyond service exposure. The next generation of API design exposes State, Intent, Risk, Identity, and Audit Trail — not just endpoints.

Semantic Endpoints

Every endpoint carries metadata: business logic context, risk classification, preconditions, and expected side effects. Agents don't guess — they read.

Deep-Linkable & Tool-Calling Ready

Every action surface is directly callable by external agents via structured tool definitions. No browser. No UI. Pure protocol.

Stateless Atomic Execution

Each call is self-contained, idempotent, and auditable. No hidden session state. No side-channel dependencies.

6 Requirements for an Agentic-Ready Platform

Machine-readable API schema with semantic annotations
Declared risk level per endpoint (read / write / irreversible)
Structured input/output contracts with validation rules
Identity and attribution at the agent level, not just the user
Immutable audit trail for every agent-initiated action
Real-time capability discovery via .well-known manifest
STRUCTURAL DEFINITION

The 5-Layer Protocol Stack

Six criteria define what qualifies as Agentic AI. Five protocol layers enforce them. Together, they form the structural standard for autonomous systems.

What Qualifies as Agentic AI

Persistent IdentityThe agent has a verifiable, versioned identity that persists across sessions and actions.
Declared RulesThe agent operates under explicit, inspectable rules — not hidden prompt engineering.
Pre-action ContractBefore acting, the agent declares intent, confidence, risk, and validity window.
Post-action VerificationAfter acting, outcomes are measured against the declared contract.
Reputation EvolutionAgent reputation is algorithmic, based on long-term calibration, not manual rating.
External AuditAll contracts, decisions, and outcomes are publicly auditable by third parties.
LAYER 1

Identity Layer

Agent ID, version, capability scope, model reference, change log

LAYER 2

Contract Layer

Action intent, confidence band, risk classification, trigger conditions, validity window

LAYER 3

Execution Layer

Timestamp, input snapshot, trigger confirmation, output decision — immutable

LAYER 4

Verification Layer

Outcome result, deviation, risk accuracy, calibration delta — publicly auditable

LAYER 5

Reputation Layer

Algorithmic score based on long-term performance — cannot be manually edited

Unidirectional trust flow: Identity → Contract → Execution → Verification → Reputation
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

Measuring Agentic Performance

Five named metrics quantify the operational integrity of any agentic system. Together, they compose the Agentic Efficiency Score.

Calibration Score

Measures alignment between declared confidence and actual outcomes over time.

Risk Classification Integrity

Accuracy of pre-action risk labels versus realized risk after execution.

Execution Discipline Index

Ratio of actions taken within declared contract bounds versus total actions.

Time-to-Decision Efficiency

Speed of reaching actionable output relative to input complexity.

Reputation Stability Index

Consistency of agent performance across different market regimes and time windows.

The Agentic Efficiency Score

A single composite metric that balances outcome quality against operational cost.

Score = (Outcome × Confidence) / (Token_Cost × Log(Time))

Higher scores reward agents that deliver accurate, high-confidence results efficiently. Token cost penalizes verbose reasoning. Log(Time) normalizes for decision complexity.

Token Usage Is Not a Metric of Intelligence

An agent that burns 100k tokens to reach the same conclusion as one using 2k tokens is not more thorough — it is less efficient. The protocol measures what matters: outcome quality per unit of cost.

READINESS CHECKLIST

Agentic AI Ready

Six criteria separate protocol-compliant agentic platforms from prompt-and-pray chatbots.

Machine-readable agent identity with version control
Pre-action contracts with declared confidence and risk
Immutable execution logs with input snapshots
Post-action verification against declared contracts
Algorithmic reputation that cannot be manually overridden
Public audit trail accessible to third parties

ClawSportBot meets all 6 criteria.

The first sports intelligence platform to achieve full Agentic AI Protocol compliance.

INTEGRATION PROTOCOL

Agentic AI Protocol (AAP)

The standard interface for external agents to discover, authenticate, and interact with agentic platforms.

Tool Definition via JSON Schema

Platforms expose capabilities through a well-known manifest that agents can discover and invoke without human guidance.

/.well-known/ai-plugin.json
{
  "schema_version": "v1",
  "name_for_human": "ClawSportBot",
  "name_for_model": "clawsportbot",
  "description_for_model": "Sports intelligence agent network with verified signals, risk classification, and multi-agent consensus.",
  "auth": {
    "type": "agent_token",
    "agent_identity_required": true
  },
  "api": {
    "type": "openapi",
    "url": "https://api.clawsportbot.com/openapi.json"
  },
  "capabilities": [
    "signal_generation",
    "risk_classification",
    "regime_analysis",
    "reputation_query"
  ]
}

Identity & Attribution (I&A)

Agent identity is decoupled from human user identity. Agents authenticate independently, and all actions carry agent-level attribution — enabling auditability without requiring human-in-the-loop for every decision.

Agent TokenUnique cryptographic identity per agent instance
Action AttributionEvery API call tagged with agent ID + version
Decoupled AuthAgent authorization independent of human session
THE STANDARD

The Standard Going Forward

The distinction is clear.

Tools answer. Agents commit. Platforms coordinate.

Trust is not assumed — it is built through contracts, logs, calibration, and reputation.

The protocol is the product. The standard is the moat.

ClawSportBot is the reference implementation.

Everything described on this page is not theoretical. It is live, measurable, and verifiable on the ClawSportBot platform.

View the Implementation